The command will definitely work with an error, this is due to the fact that an extremely limited number of megafunctions support (and at the same time correctly support) clinging to Simulink. We type the command alt_dspbuilder_setup_megacorein the Matlab command window and get: If you had DSP Builder bundled with Quartus and before installing megafunctions (and this is probably true), then megafunctions should be picked up. Examples, I must say, are very clear and cover almost all the typical tasks encountered by plisovodam. And the corresponding section in Matlab's help and links to examples. After a successful installation, two libraries should appear in Simulink: Altera DSP Builder Advanced Blockset and Altera DSP Builder Advanced Blockset. Fortunately, she easily finds and clings to Matlaba, dearly beloved by the author, (in the opinion of the author, the best after the famous version 6.5). Therefore, I will only talk about the version that comes with the 11.0th Quartus. It is especially touching when the DSP Builder point blank does not notice the installed Matlab and at least what do you do!īut the author for himself found a very stable bunch. With the ensuing dances with incompatibility of versions and some completely strange inconsistencies. The second reason is a bunch of three very heterogeneous programs and environments.
And the former can’t understand why they need this “builder” (and there’s also some kind of Simulink!), And the latter sculpt the algorithms and say “their implementation is none of my business!” (a real picture from one famous domestic office). Such specialists are piece-wise and have three-digit zp. True, this can be partially explained by the fact that quite rarely specialists are well versed in plisovodstvo and signal processing. Moreover, this attitude to DSP Builder is especially incomprehensible against the background of enthusiastic reviews towards Active HDL shells. For some reason, it is believed that DSP Builder is "for students." The situation is just like with Delphi. The first is a somewhat contemptuous attitude of harsh plisovodov to this product. In my opinion, this situation was created for two reasons. But it’s strange, because DSP Builder is almost a revolution unnoticed by anyone in the field of FPGA construction.
To my surprise, I did not find a single article on Habr dedicated to DSP Builder (maybe it was a bad search?).